| |
C.5 |
An Institute of Economic Growth and Society |
| |
|
|
| |
|
There has, moreover, been a rising awareness
that environmental conditions and resources must be respected
in strategies of economic growth. The environmental destruction
that heedless economic development has produced in the ex-USSR
and elsewhere have made evident that "sustainable economic growth"
is more than a popular slogan, and is a requirement of sound
policy. As the Rio de Janeiro Conference proclaimed last year,
the pursuit of economic growth and environmental protection
are fatefully intertwined. |
| |
|
|
| |
5.5 |
Laying forth these complex interrelations of economic growth
with governance, institution-building, and environmental protection
is to present a daunting array of challenges. There may be understandable
dispositions to think that AKU is too modest an institution
to tackle such large questions. We do, however, believe it should
not shirk the challenge and should address the frontier issues
in economic growth in their presently perceived complexity,
giving particular attention to the Muslim world and the
interactions between its history and culture and its contemporary
institutions and problems. |
| |
|
|
| |
5.6 |
A fully comprehensive agenda covering all the determinants
and conditions of growth might be overwhelming. At various stages
in the Commission's deliberations we have given particular attention
to one or another of the subjects set forth above. The question
of governance of Muslim and developing societies has repeatedly
entered our discussions. We have considered and rejected the
idea of proposing a special component of AKU devoted to governance
or public administration , seeking AKU's contributions on these
vital matters in other ways, such as what the Institute of Islamic
Civilisations may do for the education of citizens in Muslim
societies and for the understanding of their governance problems.
Similarly we have explored the idea of institutes of architecture
and development that would be engaged in spatial planning
and environmental questions. AKU's efforts in the generic problems
of development would thus be scattered in different parts of
the University, rather than being entrusted to a single component.
|
| |
|
|
| |
5.7 |
We believe, nonetheless, that AKU should establish an "Institute
on Economic Growth and Society" that would be very broadly
concerned with the major determinants of development. It would
have a core group of economists but would be freely interdisciplinary.
It would conduct research and writing, and offer post-graduate
training, beginning with short courses and workshops, and later
adding Masters and Doctors degrees as need and feasibility indicate.
The Institute, should actively seek consulting and advisory
contracts and engage in policy and programme issues. We believe
it could begin at a modest size, with two senior and half a
dozen junior staff (these latter as junior faculty, post or
predoctoral students). We would expect it to double its staff
over the years as its activities grow. |
| |
|
|
| |
5.8 |
Depending upon location, such aii Institute could serve as
the nucleus of a broader AKU competence in economic policy
aud analysis. The Commission has been concerned that AKU
is rapidly becoming engaged in matteters of health and educational
policy which require economic competencies it does not now have.
The growth of the already starting programme in Health Policy
and Management will sharpen die need for such competencies.
If the Institute we it are proposing were located in Karachi
it could, witil suitable expansion serve as a general locus
of economic competencies for the University. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
There will also be broader needs foiinstruction in economics
as liberal arts education grows in AKU. The broadened educatioual
programme we envisage for the Faculty of Healtli Sciences, and
the College of Arts and Sciences that we expect to come along
later, should have good basic courses in economics that will
require qualified professors. In the continuing educatioll functions
in various fields that we envisage as an important part of AKU's
future activlities, instruction in economics should certainly
have a place. It might even happen that at some point ill the
future the Institute of Economic Growth and Society would be
linked to a (suitably nontraditional) department of economics
in AKU. |
| |
|
|
| |
5.9 |
The Harvard Report recommended a Centre or School of Development
Policy aud Management for AKU and proposed that it be located
in Kenya, with a site in India as a possible alternative. Despite
some advantages, just reviewed, of a Karachi location, this
Commission is disposed to favour an East African location for
the Institute we are proposing, again with the possibility of
India as an alternative. It would seem likely that Kenya might
emerge as a preferred location in East Africa, but we empbasise
that we conceive this Institute as having an international outlook
and vocation; it would naturally be attentive to the regional
ties that will be important to Africa's economic growth and
that are given new scope by reliance on open, market economies.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Our conception of the Institute of Economic Growth and Society
would put more emphasis on research and policy than management,
though certainly not to the exclusion of the latter. As we suggested
above, the AKU's Institute should have its educational impact
in its first years through short courses, workshops and seminars,
particularly with middle- and seniorlevel people, avoiding the
large scale investment that would be involved in a full-fledged
school of management. We would of course want to see the Institute
making serious contributions to the economic growth of Muslim
societies and to the South Asian region. Both these objectives
raise the prospect that the Institute would need to have a secondary
locus in South Asia. |
| |
|
|
| |
5.10 |
Wherever located, the Institute we are proposing
should be well linked to other parts of AKU, to AKDN, and to
universities and research centres throughout the world. We would
think there is a natural two-way relationship between an AKU
centre concerned with economic growth and the Aga Khan Fund
for Economic Development, to their mutual benefit. Reaching
beyond AKDN, it would be essential that AKU establish good relations
with some of the world's leading groups dealing with sustainable
economic growth. The Canadian Institute for Advanced Research's
group on economic growth and the UNU's World Institute of Development
Economics Research in Helsinki come to mind as attractive Possibilities.
Visiting appointments at both senior and junior levels would
be important means of establishing and sustaining such linkages.
|
| |
|
|
| |
5.11 |
Such an Institute could not deal with all Of the conditions
and aspects of economic growth that we identified above. But
we would hope that it would contribute significantly on subjects
that are not the normal business of economic analysis centres
and that require the broad interdisciplinary outlook we believe
it should have. We would hope in particular that this Institute
might make significant contributions on the subject of governance,
not solely in technical questions of the making of economic
policy but on such matters as the costs of corruption and clientelism,
and means of controlling them. The special questions of economics
in Muslim societies would be a natural focus of attention, and
their study might be facilitated by being placed in an international
Muslim university, not beholden to a single government. The
possibilities of bringing environmental considerations into
the Institute's analyses would seem to be inevitably numerous,
but AKU may in the longer run wish to have more focused attention
on them, as would be one of the features of a component to which
we now turn. |
Page 1 2
[Previous] [Next]
|