| |
C.3 |
An AKU Institute Devoted to Study of Islamic Civilisations
|
| |
|
|
| |
3.1 |
In earlier sections of this report we have presented arguments
and evidence that changes in n the world have made the mission
of the Aga Khan University as a Muslim university more important
than it was a decade ago. Agitated concerns over the proper
role of Islam in the economies, the public lifeand governance
of Muslim countries, and tensions in the relations of Islam
with the "West" are now at high levels; and they seem likely
to remain so in the coming decades. The well?being and serenity
of the Muslim Ummah in the 21st century will depend on many
things, on economic growth, on improvements in education and
health and other requisites of the good life to which AKU may
contribute through its various faculties and programmes. But
we have also proposed in Section V that AKU pursue its special
mission as a Muslim institution by developing : (1) research
and scholarship on Islamic civilisations and the contemporary
Muslim world; (2) education for AKU students and materials for
the education of others, Muslims and non-Muslims; (3) a participation
with others, Muslim and nonMuslim, in coping with the problems
of the modern world. We regard these matters as of great
urgency, and recommend that an Institute of Islamic Civilisations
be given first priority as AKU broadens beyond its present
fields of activity. |
| |
|
|
| |
3.2 |
We believe that AKU is exceptionally well-placed to develop
as a unique Muslim university in the 21st century. There is
the comparative advantage that Professor Keenan stressed in
1983, viz., that unlike other Muslim universities it need not
be hostage to a particular government or the conditions in a
particular country, and can devote itself in exceptional freedom
to the "Islamisation of modernity". The name of the Aga Khan
has also been associated with the highest levels of scholarship
through such beneficences as the Aga Khan Professorships of
Iranian and of Islamic Art and Architecture at Harvard, and
the Aga Khan Professorship of Architecture and Design for Islamic
Culture at MIT. Through these professorships and the Aga Khan
Program for Islamic Architecture (AKPIA) at these institutions
it may be fairly claimed that the name of the Aga Khan has been
decisively associated with the building of the academic field
of Islamic art and architecture - a field which hardly existed
as a living academic communit , before these benefactions and
programmes.
In the wider domains of practice, the Architectural Awards Programme
has brought similar association of the Aga Khan's name with
concern for promoting the quality and cultural sensitivity of
architecture in the Muslim world, an association now being extended
through the Historic Cities Support Programme. Indeed, over
the field of its interests, the Aga Khan Trust for Culture stands
nearly alone. In a less conspicuous way, the Institute of Ismaili
Studies has engaged many of the world's leading scholars of
Islam, and is now launching a very promising new graduate programme
in Islamic studies. |
| |
|
|
| |
3.3 |
AKU thus has freedom, resources and a prestigious tradition
behind it that give the potential for very important, perhaps
even unique, contributions as a Muslim university. But what
does it mean to be a Muslim university and what, concretely,
must AKU do to fulfil the missions we have sketched out for
it ? |
| |
|
|
| |
3.4 |
We have described briefly in Section III.4 of this report
the pattern of distinction between universities in the Muslim
world based on Western models and universities that are devoted
to Islamic learning. We have also described two efforts, in
Jordan and Malaysia, to develop forms of higher education that
seek to combine imported professional and scientific education
with Islamic elements, aiming to produce graduates who are good
Muslims, as well as competent citizens of their countries and
the modern world. There have clearly been similar aspirations
for AKU to be a Muslim university in more senses than that it
seeks to serve the Muslim world and has most of its activities
therein. |
| |
|
|
| |
3.5 |
Such aspirations appeared in responses to the Harvard Committee's
recommendations on AKU studies of Muslim culture and societies.
A 1988 paper on the proposed Faculty of Islamic Humanities for
AKU that grew out of the Harvard report spoke of avoiding "purely
secularistic analytical positions"; and Mohammed Arkoun, one
of the principal architects of the new programme at the Institute
of Ismaili Studies, has resisted "purely ethnographic" views
of cultures. [In Ouverture sur l'Islain Paris (Grancher) 1992,
and certainly elsewhere in his abundant writings.] Aspirations
of AKU to be an educational institution in more than technocratic
respects inevitably press it to more than analytical concerns
with Islam and Muslim societies. Our acceptance of missions
for AKU in the education of both Muslims and non?Muslims in
the modern world must imply the sympathetic agreement in the
Commission with such a stance. AKU in a great part of its present
and future work must have the detached and critical stance of
modern learning. But as a university representing and studying
the Islamic tradition from which it springs it cannot rest in
cool detachment. It must seek ways to combine disciplined,
objective inquiry with imaginative efforts to use its heritage
to provide visions of the meaning of life in the modern world. |
| |
|
|
| |
3.6 |
In pursuing these high objectives, the opposite pole to pure
detachment of adopting an apologetic or defensive attitude -
championing rather than understanding, insisting on dogma rather
than elucidation - must be avoided. This is particularly important
in view of the strident manifestation of such attitudes in some
of the contemporary extremist Islamic movements. |
| |
|
|
| |
3.7 |
What should then be the course between these poles for AKU
? Intellectually and conceptually, the non-normative and constructive
programme in graduate studies now being launched by the Institute
of Ismaili Studies in collaboration with Cambridge University
has appealed strongly to the Commission. The missions of IIS
and AKU are different and we see good reasons to keep them distinct.
But the approach to Islam as a civilisation in the historical
and non?normative ways that appear in the programme with Cambridge
has commended itself to us as appropriate for AKU. We therefore
quote at some length, salient passages from the Institute's
current philosophical statement : |
| |
|
|
| |
|
"The programme seeks to avoid a division of pertinent disciplines
... in the study of Muslim societies ... [aiming] to produce
an integrated analysis ... conceived as broadly as possible
... The premise is that 'Islam' can more fruitfully be treated
as a civilisation (our emphasis, here and subsequently) rather
than a religion only ... This means ... that religious developments
will be seen as part of the development of thought and culture
in Muslim societies [and] those aspects of culture, like art,
poetry, and architecture, which are not always treated at par
with doctrine, law or religious practice, will be so regarded
in this programme ... As culture cannot be studied in isolationfrom
society ... [the] inter-relationship of ideas and meanings to
social andpoliticalforces will be treated as one of the keys
to integrated understanding of the subject." (this last
sentence slightly re-arranged). |
| |
|
|
| |
|
"... the diverse definitions and schools of thought which
emerged in Islam must be understood historically ... A historical
approach to Islam must be balanced by a due appreciation of
the meaning religious ideas have for their followers ... The
programme willgive due attention, therefore, to the role of
poetic and imaginative discourse in the shaping of spiritual
life in Muslim cultures ... While the approach to Islam as a
civilisation is intended to integrate as well as enlarge both
the subject matter and the angles of study, this does not preclude
an appreciation of the enormous diversity of Muslin, societies
... The diversity of these expressions [of Islam] must be noted
without normatire judgements of their validity ... Similarly,
the programme will examine the important 'Classical' languages
(Arabic, Persian) but also national ' regional or local vernaculars
... Two other objectives of this non?normative approach [are]
... to reexamine the emphasis on 'learned' ... Islam to the
relative neglect of ' opular'and oral traditions ... p and to
pay full attention to the practic(d manifestation of Islamic
ideals in living societies. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
".. . [Tlhere is a su rviving tendency
in the field of Islamic studiesfor the studies of the past to
proceed along separate lines from those of contemporary Muslim
societies ... The intellectuol framework of this programme is
designed to bridpe this gap ... The study of the vast changes
introduced in [contemporary Muslim] societies in the modern
period will pay attention to the meaning and images of the past,
which are current in these societies ... |
| |
|
|
| |
|
"The polarity of 'Islam' and the 'West' assumed in much
of contemporary discourse about the subject, needs to be subjected
to critical analysis ... The overlap of some of the more fundamental
issues of society and culture today (across Western and non?Western
lands, or across the developed and developing worlds) will be
noted without the distortions inherent in too facile an opposition
between the 'West'and 'non-West'." |
Page 1 2 3
[Previous] [Next]
|