4 The International Character and Dispersion of the University
     
    In describing "The Aga Khan University at Age Ten" in Section V above we included a paragraph addressing its Pakistani and international characters which we repeat here for convenient recall :
     
    "Being set down in a major city in Pakistan with a Pakistani charter and a board that must have at least three Pakistanis among its thirteen members, AKU has been in major respects a Pakistani institution. In itsfirst ten years its student body has been overwhelmingly Pakistani, its faculty largely so, and, as we have regularly heard, it has been strongly concerned to serve the needs of Pakistan. At the same time, AKU has not forgotten its aspiration to be an international university. Its financial support, board and academic leadership have been strongly international; important relationships with universities in other parts of the world have been established; and aspirations to make the university more international, through the relevance of its accomplishments and the founding Of new branches, are warmly supported by the present staff. And using English as its language of instruction, it is immersed in what has increasingly become the international language of the sciences. In its history thus far, AKU has been preoccupied with building its first parts in a particular country, but its commitment to being an international university, serving the Muslim and developing worlds, is firmly maintained."
     
    The ambition to be an international university is a demanding ambition, but it is a natural ambition of universities if they are to deal with the broad corpus of modern knowledge in a globalised world. No university that aims to be great or distinguished can now confine its interests and purposes to a single country or even to a region of the world. Efforts to avoid parochialism in curricula, staff and student bodies have therefore received great attention and resources in the leading universities, particularly in the second half of this century. Presidents of universities like Harvard or Princeton sought in the early years of this century to make their institutions genuinely national in their reach and significance; their recent successors have been busy winning an international character for them. Much of what makes a university international in character goes on in its own country on its own campus. But the establishment of programmes or branches outside the country is also normal, as in the study-abroad programmes or special research institutions attached to American universities. The rationale for setting up such outliers in foreign parts must give justification for the costs and administrative difficulties involved; it must typically rest on grounds that the university cannot fulfil its educational and research missions from its home base; and it must also argue that linkages or networks with other institutions abroad will not suffice.
     
    To say that AKU is to be an international university does not say how far it must spread physically, in how many countries it should have a presence or of what sort. It does not say that it should not have special interests in Pakistan or perhaps in another country where it may set itself down, any more than Oxford ceases to be an international university by taking a special interest in things British or Michigan by an interest in the American Midwest. It is the range of intellectual vision in research and instruction, and the composition of staff and student body that are critical. There are of course, countries and places within them that are more cosmopolitan than others, and it may be a fair generalisation that it has been harder for universities in developing countries to pursue international interests than for their counterparts in the richer, industrial countries. The presumption which was put into the AKU's Charter that it would engage in activities n both within and beyond Pakistan appears to us as prudent recognition that achieving an international character and outlook for AKU, as a university beginning in a developing country, might require a broader geographic spread than would be the case for a university beginning in Europe or North America.
     
    The record of political instability and authoritarian government that the Third World has unfortunately shown gives reason for concern about concentrating all of AKU in a single location anywhere in the Third World. We have been happy that AKU has been able thus far to develop successfully in Karachi. This experience in Pakistan has given encouragement that an institution respected for its quality and valued for the services it provides to the country can gain the favour and support of successive governments, as AKU has with three governments after its founding under General Zia's. But merit and devoted service are not infallible protections; they will not always ensure a university against disruption and intrusion. And universities that are true to their academic responsibilities must sometimes do and say things that are poorly understood by or are unwelcome to governments that have power over them. When the option is available, as it is for AKU, the prudential course must be not to risk all its commitments in a single location.
     
    Special concerns with South Asia and East Africa have followed from those of AKU's founder and the Ismaili community; and being part of the Muslim world has extended these areas of concern from South East Asia and across the Middle East and Africa. The dispersion of the Muslim population of the world to Europe and America and the opening of Central Asia to the international community have further extended the areas of concern to AKU. Clear ideas on locations and geographic spread for AKU must depend on the fields that it will develop, but we are able at this stage of the discussion to conclude that :
     
  i) An AKU that has all its principal components in Pakistan will not be a sufficiently international university. We do not mean to diminish the efforts that have been made and that will continue to be made to give international dimensions and perspectives to the parts of the University now or in future situated in Pakistan. We envisage that AKU may develop units in other countries which would be related to faculties and institutes in the Pakistan centre (as, e.g., a Professional Development Centre in East Africa related to IED or a Nursing Institute there, related to the School of Nursing) and that these will serve to strengthen the international interests at AKU in Pakistan. The components of AKU that are in Pakistan ought to have Pakistani interests; but not all of AKU can give primacy to Pakistan if it is to be an international university. Hence the need for new fields to be developed elsewhere.
     
  ii) A bipolar AKU in which the Pakistan AKU would be one component and the other would consist of one or more institutes or units in a single location would probably also be too limited. Earlier views that subjects particularly concerned with Islam and Muslim societies had better be developed in Europe has found confirmation in this Commission's persuasion, set forth in Section VII, that such subjects need to be developed in Europe in relationships with AKTC and IIS and in insulation from pressures that have come with the rise of radical activist movements in Islam. If this were to be done as the single non-Pakistani site for AKU, there would be no direct engagement with Africa and Central Asia, areas which present ample difficulties, but which are of special interest for AKU.
     
  iii) We must therefore assume that the AKU of the future will have a presence in at least three regions of the world. The meaning of a "presence" is of course vague, and large disparities in size and breadth may result. But our judgements on such possibilities must follow on our later consideration of the fields that lie in AKU's future.
     
    Universities that have significant branches in different countries are quite rare. We have reviewed the history of such examples as the University of the West Indies, the now-defunct University of East Africa, and of course the United Nations University. They do not make the future we are proposing for AKU look easy, but we do not see that it can fulfil its mission without accepting the challenges that being international impose on it.

[Previous] [Next]

 
[Home Page] [Preface] [Executive Summary] [Contents] [Appendix] [List Of Institutions]