| |
3 |
The State of Higher Education in 1994 and Prospects
for the Future |
| |
|
|
| |
3.1 |
The Growth of Private Higher Education Since 1983 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Since AKU was established there has been a significant strengthening
of the place of private higher education in the Third World .The
establishment of AKU came at a fortunate time when new sympathies
for private higher education were appearing after decades of
resistance. AKU has had a pioneering role in Pakistan, its good
example encouraging the birth of several new private institutions.
The growth of private higher education in Pakistan has been
part of a trend toward privatisation of higher education
that has been notable in both developing and industrial countries.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
One motivation has been the desire for better quality that
has inspired the founding of AKU. Another driving force has
been the mass demand for higher education that has strained
public resources and led to efforts of many sorts to supplement
them. Both rich and poor countries have felt pressures to move
away from traditions of essentially free higher education and
make the beneficiaries of higher education pay some part of
its costs. In the developing countries, European traditions
of free higher education were strengthened in the decades after
World War II by egalitarian nationalism, with resulting strong
resistances to fee-paying private institutions or private costsharing.
The sharp distinction made in Meiji Japan between free public
education for the needs of the state, and fee-paying private
higher education for individual advantage was made nowhere in
the Third World. But what we have called the irresistible expansion
of higher education has brought changes of attitude and policy
in recent decades, as governments have been forced to seek ways
to share its costs with private wealth. Sharp resistances have
appeared in many places, rich and poor. In Egypt, recent efforts
to relieve the disastrous state of public higher education by
allowing the establishment of a private university (or universities)
have been opposed on the moral grounds that ability to pay fees
should provide no advantage in access to higher education. And
in Europe we read that a contributing cause to the March-April
1994 demonstrations against the French government's proposal
to change the minimum wage for young people was anger in the
public universities over proposed increases in the public support
of private schools [Corriere della Sera, April 2, 1994,
p.9]. Such resistance has produced tactical retreats, but the
overall trend has been toward increased recourse to private
cost-sharing and private institutions in higher education, a
trend that has certainly been strengthened by the rising legitimacy
of private institutions throughout national societies. A pragmatic
realisation that the dual objectives of remedying deficiencies
in quality while widening opportunities for higher education
require the growth of private higher education has now largely
overcome the hesitations of past decades. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
The recourse to private institutions both as a way of responding
to the powerful demand for higher education and as a means of
achieving special quality is certainly no transitory feature
of the 1990s. We expect it to continue for decades to come,
and to provide Aga Khan University with opportunities to
serve as an influential model in many countries. The academic
level of many -perhaps the great majority -of new private institutions
may be as poor as has been common in the Philippines, or Indonesia,
or Brazil. But the growth of a substantial private sector in
higher education may permit the emergence of the healthy educational
diversity that has been seen in the United States, Japan, or
the Philippines, with competition and emulation acting as steady
forces for academic improvement. In such situations an institution
of high quality, such as AKU aims to be, can exert a broad influence
in whole national systems. One of the serious difficulties faced
by private higher education in many developing countries has
been the principle of uniform national standards in degrees.
This carryover of European practice will have to be eased if
the creative variety that a private higher education sector
potentially offers can be realised. Fortunately, there are signs
of new interest in differentiation and variety which we can
now relate. |
Page 1 2 3
4
[Previous] [Next]
|